USPTO serial 85124661
LANRIC
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 4068318Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Dec 6, 2011
- Examiner
- FALK, ERIN
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with LANRIC?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
SYARIKAT LAN-RIC INDUSTRIES SDN BHD (41948-V)
IPOH, PERAK, MY
Other trademarks owned by SYARIKAT LAN-RIC INDUSTRIES SDN BHD (41948-V)
SYARIKAT LAN-RIC INDUSTRIES SDN BHD (41948-V)
IPOH, PERAK, MY
Other trademarks owned by SYARIKAT LAN-RIC INDUSTRIES SDN BHD (41948-V)
SYARIKAT LAN-RIC INDUSTRIES SDN BHD (41948-V)
IPOH, PERAK, MY
Other trademarks owned by SYARIKAT LAN-RIC INDUSTRIES SDN BHD (41948-V)
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
RICHARD L MORRIS JR.
RICHARD L MORRIS JR ESQ TrademarkRenewals.comPO BOX 398538c/o 1-800-4-TRADEMARKMIAMI BEACH, FL 33239-8538Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 006 | METAL CABLE TRAYS USED IN BUILDING CONSTRUCTION; CABLE TRUNKING, CABLE TRAY, CABLE LADDER, UNDERFLOOR TRUNKING, RAISED FLOOR TRUNKING, FLUSH FLOOR TRUNKING AND ACCESSORIES THEREFOR ALL OF WHICH IS MADE OF METAL, AND NOT FOR ELECTRICAL INSTALLATIONS AND INSTEAD USED TO HOLD CABLES | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Oct 9, 2010 |
| 009 | PLASTIC CONDUIT FOR ELECTRICAL USE; ELECTRICAL RACK SYSTEM CONSISTING OF ELECTRICAL CABLES, SHELVING, AND COOLING AND VENTILATION SYSTEMS FOR HOUSING, ORGANIZING AND PROTECTING ELECTRICAL COMPONENTS; BOXES ADAPTED FOR HOUSING ELECTRIC INSTRUMENTS AND ELECTRIC CABLE BOXES, NAMELY, JUNCTION BOXES; ELECTRICITY CONDUITS IN THE NATURE OF CABLE TRUNKING, CABLE TRAY, CABLE LADDER, UNDERFLOOR TRUNKING, RAISED FLOOR TRUNKING, FLUSH FLOOR TRUNKING AND ACCESSORIES THEREFOR ALL OF WHICH IS MADE OF METAL AND PLASTIC | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Oct 9, 2010 |
| 019 | NONMETAL CABLE TRAYS USED IN BUILDING CONSTRUCTION; CABLE TRUNKING, CABLE TRAY, CABLE LADDER, UNDERFLOOR TRUNKING, RAISED FLOOR TRUNKING, FLUSH FLOOR TRUNKING AND ACCESSORIES THEREFOR ALL OF WHICH IS MADE OF PLASTIC AND NOT FOR ELECTRICAL INSTALLATIONS AND INSTEAD USED TO HOLD CABLES | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Oct 9, 2010 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by SYARIKAT LAN-RIC INDUSTRIES SDN BHD (41948-V)
- Other trademarks owned by SYARIKAT LAN-RIC INDUSTRIES SDN BHD (41948-V)
- Other trademarks owned by SYARIKAT LAN-RIC INDUSTRIES SDN BHD (41948-V)
- Other trademarks in Class 006
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 019
- Similar marks named LANRIC
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 13, 2018 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Dec 6, 2016 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 11, 2013 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 6, 2011 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Oct 29, 2011 | SUNA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF STATEMENT OF USE E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 28, 2011 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 28, 2011 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Oct 7, 2011 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 6, 2011 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 4, 2011 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Oct 4, 2011 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Sep 20, 2011 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 26, 2011 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 26, 2011 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 22, 2011 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 22, 2011 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 22, 2011 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 22, 2011 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 22, 2011 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 22, 2011 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 22, 2011 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 22, 2011 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 22, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 1, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 31, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 31, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 19, 2011 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 19, 2011 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 19, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 29, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 29, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 25, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 21, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 2, 2011 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 2, 2011 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 2, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 17, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 11, 2010 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Sep 11, 2010 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |