USPTO serial 85125139
TRILOGY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LAVACHE, LINDA M
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 106 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with TRILOGY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Lisa M. Caldwell
LISA M. CALDWELL KLARQUIST SPARKMAN, LLP121 SW SALMON ST STE 1600PORTLAND, OR 97204-2988UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Voice communications and voice interoperability systems comprising, devices for transporting and aggregating voice across multiple network infrastructures and communications protocols, computer hardware and software for control of voice controlled information and communication devices, managing, securing and operating local and wide area networks and telephony systems, telephones, telephone apparatus, wireless communications devices comprising wireless hardware and software for the transmission of voice and audio call processing, software for the transmission of voice traffic, telecommunications switches, communications servers, and computer hardware containing network security functionality including firewalls, data encryption, and interoperability with network security protocols | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 28, 2014 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 28, 2014 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 30, 2013 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 30, 2013 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 30, 2013 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 30, 2013 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jun 26, 2013 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 26, 2013 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 26, 2013 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 26, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 26, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 21, 2013 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 3, 2013 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 3, 2013 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 3, 2013 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 2, 2013 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jul 2, 2012 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 2, 2012 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 2, 2012 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 2, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 2, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 27, 2012 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 3, 2012 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 3, 2012 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 3, 2012 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 29, 2011 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Dec 29, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 28, 2011 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 28, 2011 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 28, 2011 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 17, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 17, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 17, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 17, 2010 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 17, 2010 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 17, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 17, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 13, 2010 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Sep 11, 2010 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |