Drawing for QUICKMEDS PHARMACY

USPTO serial 85125242

QUICKMEDS PHARMACY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
DIXON, JENNIFER HAZARD
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 110 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with QUICKMEDS PHARMACY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Richard R. Johnson

KRIS KAPPEL HUSCH BLACKWELL LLP4801 MAIN STSUITE 1000KANSAS CITY, MO 64112-2551

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Retail pharmacy servicesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 29, 2012MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
May 25, 2012EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Apr 10, 2012ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Apr 10, 2012EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Jan 23, 2012EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Jan 23, 2012EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Jul 21, 2011GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Jul 21, 2011GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 21, 2011CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 29, 2011TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 29, 2011CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 22, 2011ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jun 20, 2011TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 20, 2010GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 20, 2010GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 20, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 17, 2010DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 14, 2010MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED—
Sep 13, 2010NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Sep 11, 2010NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance