Drawing for STOP BUGGING ME!

USPTO serial 85125792

STOP BUGGING ME!

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MARTIN, JENNIFER MCGARRY
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 116 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with STOP BUGGING ME!?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

James David Johnson

JAMES DAVID JOHNSON JAMES DAVID JOHNSON PA401 E LAS OLAS BLVD STE 130-290FORT LAUDERDALE, FL 33301-2210UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
005Insecticides; pesticides; pesticides for exterminating, namely, bed bugs and dust mitesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 5, 2013MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Mar 4, 2013ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Mar 4, 2013EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Dec 13, 2012EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Apr 11, 2012GNSNNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED—
Apr 11, 2012GNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED—
Apr 11, 2012CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED—
Feb 13, 2012JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Nov 2, 2011GEA1NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Nov 2, 2011GECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Nov 2, 2011CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
Oct 24, 2011TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 24, 2011CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 14, 2011ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Oct 7, 2011EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Oct 7, 2011JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Oct 7, 2011EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Oct 6, 2011ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Apr 7, 2011GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Apr 7, 2011GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 7, 2011CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 14, 2011TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 14, 2011CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 14, 2011TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 18, 2010GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 18, 2010GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 18, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 18, 2010DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 13, 2010NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Sep 13, 2010NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance