USPTO serial 85127070
POSTUREMATCH
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FINNEGAN, TIMOTHY
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with POSTUREMATCH?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Kevin G. Smith
KEVIN G SMITH SUGHRUE MION PLLC2100 PENNSYLVANIA AVE NWWASHINGTON, DC 20037-3202UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | BEDDING DIAGNOSTIC SYSTEM COMPRISING A COMPUTER AND COMPUTER SOFTWARE, A MATTRESS AND BOX SPRING, AND A PRESSURE SENSITIVE PAD, SOLD AS A UNIT FOR USE IN ANALYZING AND EVALUATING INDIVIDUALS AND PRESCRIBING PREFERRED MATTRESS COMPONENTS THEREFOR | ACTIVE | — |
| 020 | MATTRESSES AND BOX SPRINGS; PILLOWS | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | RETAIL BEDDING, MATTRESSES AND BEDDING ACCESSORY STORE SERVICES; ONLINE RETAIL BEDDING, MATTRESSES AND BEDDING ACCESSORY STORE SERVICES | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by KINGSDOWN, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by KINGSDOWN, INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 020
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Similar marks named POSTUREMATCH
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 2, 2015 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 2, 2015 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 13, 2014 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Jul 30, 2014 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 29, 2014 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 29, 2014 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 1, 2014 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jul 1, 2014 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 4, 2014 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 2, 2014 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 2, 2014 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jan 2, 2014 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 2, 2013 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 17, 2013 | TMBN | TTAB RELEASE CASE TO TRADEMARKS | — |
| May 17, 2013 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 17, 2013 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 30, 2012 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Jul 13, 2011 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 5, 2011 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 15, 2011 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 15, 2011 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 5, 2011 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 5, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 7, 2011 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 30, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 30, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 30, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 9, 2010 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 9, 2010 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 9, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 7, 2010 | AMPX | PRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Dec 7, 2010 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 4, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 15, 2010 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Sep 14, 2010 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |