Drawing for SMART. SIMPLE. SATISFYING.

USPTO serial 85127132

SMART. SIMPLE. SATISFYING.

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CHUO, EMILY M
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 101 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SMART. SIMPLE. SATISFYING.?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Andrea E. Friedman

ANDREA E. FRIEDMAN FRIEDMAN LAW GROUP, LTD.1700 W IRVING PARK RD STE 305ACHICAGO, IL 60613-2462UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
029Packaged frozen foods and entrees consisting primarily of pasta and cheeseACTIVE—
030Packaged frozen foods and entrees consisting primarily of pasta and cheeseACTIVE—
035Advertising and promoting the sale of packaged frozen foods in a variety of media, including the internet, television and print mediaACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 17, 2010MAB1ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT—
Dec 17, 2010ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Dec 16, 2010EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED—
Oct 27, 2010GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 27, 2010GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 27, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 25, 2010DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 15, 2010NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Sep 14, 2010NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance