Drawing for MEMORY-WEBB

USPTO serial 85127160

MEMORY-WEBB

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
GUTTADAURO, JULIE MARIE
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MEMORY-WEBB?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Mary Catherine Merz

MARY CATHERINE MERZ MERZ & ASSOCIATES, P.C.1010 LAKE ST STE 400OAK PARK, IL 60301-1135UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042Computer services, namely, hosting an interactive web site providing temporary use of online searchable databases, information storage, manipulation and retrieval of digital media, namely, family histories, incorporating photos, videos, documents, and audio notes that provide an organized interactive platform to share memories; providing temporary use of a web-based software application and database to individuals, families and interest groups, which enables users to organize, archive, export and share digital media, including synchronized content to and from social media and other third party websites, with organized attributes embedded within the media files, namely the identification of people, locations, and datesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 28, 2014MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 28, 2014ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 16, 2014EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jan 15, 2014EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Dec 20, 2013EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Dec 20, 2013EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 18, 2013EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jul 17, 2013EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Jul 12, 2013AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Jun 18, 2013EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Jun 18, 2013EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Dec 19, 2012EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Dec 18, 2012EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Dec 17, 2012EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Dec 17, 2012EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 18, 2012EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jul 17, 2012EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Jul 17, 2012AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Jun 21, 2012EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Jun 21, 2012EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 24, 2011EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Nov 22, 2011EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Nov 22, 2011EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Nov 22, 2011EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 21, 2011NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Apr 26, 2011NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Apr 26, 2011PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 23, 2011PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Mar 22, 2011ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 3, 2011CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 2, 2011TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 2, 2011CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 2, 2011TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 30, 2010GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 30, 2010GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 30, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 19, 2010DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 16, 2010MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED—
Sep 15, 2010NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Sep 14, 2010NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance