Drawing for THE SAFECRACKER

USPTO serial 85127306

THE SAFECRACKER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
JOINER, KATINA JACKSON
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with THE SAFECRACKER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Monica B. Richman

MONICA B. RICHMAN SNR DENTON US LLPP.O. BOX #061080CHICAGO, IL 60606-1080UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Multimedia goods, namely, prerecorded digital video discs and DVDs relating to discovering lost, historical or sentimental items; digital media, namely, downloadable audio and video files relating to discovering lost, historical or sentimental items; downloadable on-line discussion boards and webcasts relating to discovering lost, historical or sentimental itemsACTIVE—
041Entertainment services, namely, a multimedia program series relating to discovering lost, historical or sentimental items distributed via various platforms across multiple forms of transmission media; entertainment services, namely, an on-going television series about discovering lost, historical or sentimental itemsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 17, 2012MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 17, 2012ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 13, 2012EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Mar 11, 2012EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Mar 11, 2012AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Feb 14, 2012EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Feb 14, 2012EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 14, 2012TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Aug 16, 2011NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jun 21, 2011NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jun 21, 2011PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 13, 2011PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
May 12, 2011CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 12, 2011TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 12, 2011CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 12, 2011TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 23, 2010GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 23, 2010GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 23, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 23, 2010ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Nov 19, 2010PBCRWITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY—
Nov 10, 2010PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Nov 10, 2010ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Oct 28, 2010CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 21, 2010DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 14, 2010MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 16, 2010MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED—
Sep 15, 2010NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Sep 14, 2010NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance