Drawing for ORIOKE

USPTO serial 85128412

ORIOKE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SNAPP, TINA LOUISE
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ORIOKE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Yoon S. Ham

Yoon S. Ham LOWE HAUPTMAN HAM & BERNER LLP2318 Mill RoadSuite 1400ALEXANDRIA, VA 22314

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
041Recording studio services; Rental of audio discs; Digital imaging services; Production of radio and television programs; Entertainment services, namely, providing an on-going radio program in the field of music and art; Rental of records or sound-recorded magnetic tapes, audio disc recording for others; Entertainment services in the nature of presenting live musical performances; Music composition services for others, Entertainment information service; Sports information service; Entertainment services, namely, providing information by means of a global computer network in the field of popular culture; Music information service; Live music information service; Entertainment services, namely, providing on-line computer games; Production of audio recordings; Production of music performances; Education in the field of music and art rendered through correspondence courses; Entertainment services, namely, providing on-line computer games; Educational services, namely, conducting courses in the field of Internet usage; and Educational examination via InternetACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 28, 2013MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 27, 2013ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 13, 2013TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Oct 27, 2012EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED—
Oct 25, 2012EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Oct 25, 2012EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Oct 25, 2012EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Apr 27, 2012EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED—
Apr 25, 2012EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Apr 25, 2012EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Apr 25, 2012EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Oct 25, 2011NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Aug 30, 2011PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 10, 2011NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jul 26, 2011PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jul 25, 2011CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 25, 2011TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 25, 2011CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 11, 2011ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jun 23, 2011TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 28, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 28, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 20, 2010DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 17, 2010NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Sep 16, 2010NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance