CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for JUNKYARD DOG

USPTO serial 85128844

JUNKYARD DOG

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
AYALA, LOURDES
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with JUNKYARD DOG?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

James R. Yee

JAMES R. YEE HOWARD AND HOWARD450 W 4TH STROYAL OAK, MI 48067-2557UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
012Car seats for pets; carts for carrying animalsACTIVE—
018Saddlebags, All-purpose carrying bags; pet leashes, pet collars, pet collar accessory, namely, attachments for pet collars for holding small articles, namely, cell phones; pet apparel, namely, shirts, sweaters, hats, clothing for domestic pets; animal carriers; shoulder vanity animal carriersACTIVE—
019Modular dog houses; pre-fabricated dog housesACTIVE—
020Beds for household pets; pet folding chairsACTIVE—
021Pet feeding and drinking bowls; grooming tools for pets, namely, combs and brushesACTIVE—
028Pet toysACTIVE—
031Pet treatsACTIVE—
035providing an online retail store featuring pet accessories; on-line wholesale and retail store services featuring pet accessories; online services, namely, providing wholesale and retail store services through a websiteACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 22, 2012MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 22, 2012ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 22, 2012EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Mar 20, 2012EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Mar 20, 2012EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Mar 20, 2012EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 20, 2011NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jul 26, 2011NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jul 26, 2011PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 23, 2011PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jun 23, 2011ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jun 8, 2011CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 8, 2011XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Jun 8, 2011GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jun 8, 2011GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jun 8, 2011CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Jun 3, 2011TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 3, 2011CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 3, 2011TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 22, 2010GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 22, 2010GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 22, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 21, 2010DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 17, 2010NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Sep 17, 2010NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance