Drawing for EARTHBORN HOLISTIC

USPTO serial 85128946

EARTHBORN HOLISTIC

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
GRIFFIN, JAMES
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 103 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with EARTHBORN HOLISTIC?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Timothy D. Pecsenye

TIMOTHY D PECSENYE BLANK ROME LLP1 LOGAN SQ FL 8PHILADELPHIA, PA 19103-6998UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
031Cat foodACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 22, 2015MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
May 20, 2015ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
May 20, 2015EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Nov 10, 2014CTDACT DECISION: AFFIRMED—
Nov 13, 2013EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Aug 27, 2013DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 19, 2012GNSNNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED—
Oct 19, 2012GNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED—
Oct 19, 2012CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED—
Aug 23, 2012JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Jun 5, 2012EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
May 18, 2012EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Mar 30, 2012GEA1NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Mar 30, 2012GECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Mar 30, 2012CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
Mar 10, 2012NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED—
Mar 10, 2012PGTTPETITION GRANTED - TTAB APPEAL FILED—
Mar 6, 2012MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 2, 2012APETASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF—
Mar 1, 2012TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 1, 2012PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Aug 23, 2011GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Aug 23, 2011GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 23, 2011CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 2, 2011ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Aug 2, 2011CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 11, 2011ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jun 24, 2011MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 22, 2010GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 22, 2010GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 22, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 22, 2010DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 17, 2010NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Sep 17, 2010NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance