Drawing for THE THIRD WAVE OF SILICON

USPTO serial 85129196

THE THIRD WAVE OF SILICON

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
GOLDEN, JAMES B
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 119 - MANAGING ATTORNEY

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with THE THIRD WAVE OF SILICON?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Lori Lee Yamato

Lori Lee Yamato Knobbe Martens Olson & Bear, LLP2040 Main Street, 14th FloorIrvine, CA 92614UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Silicon integrated circuitsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 24, 2015MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Mar 23, 2015ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Aug 15, 2014GNS2NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Aug 15, 2014GNSIINQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Aug 15, 2014CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
Aug 15, 2014DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 24, 2014RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Jan 2, 2014RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jun 20, 2013GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jun 20, 2013GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jun 20, 2013CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Jun 18, 2013GNS2NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jun 18, 2013GNSIINQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jun 18, 2013CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
Dec 13, 2012GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Dec 13, 2012GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Dec 13, 2012CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Sep 12, 2012GNS2NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Sep 12, 2012GNSIINQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Sep 12, 2012CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
Feb 21, 2012GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Feb 21, 2012GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Feb 21, 2012CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Feb 8, 2012ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 8, 2012REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Aug 25, 2011GNS2NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Aug 25, 2011GNSIINQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Aug 25, 2011CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
Aug 24, 2011RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Feb 23, 2011GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Feb 23, 2011GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Feb 23, 2011CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Feb 3, 2011TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Feb 3, 2011CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 3, 2011ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jan 25, 2011TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 7, 2011GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 7, 2011GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 7, 2011CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 21, 2010DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 18, 2010NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Sep 17, 2010NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance