Drawing for POWERBLOCK

USPTO serial 85129361

POWERBLOCK

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CHUO, EMILY M
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with POWERBLOCK?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Pamela Payne Smith

Pamela Payne Smith Balch & Bingham LLP1901 Sixth Ave N, Suite 1500Birmingham, AL 35203UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007Mechanical engine parts for land vehiclesACTIVE—
012Drivetrain parts for land vehicles in the nature of vehicle power train mechanism comprised of clutch, transmission, drive shaft, and differentialACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 26, 2015MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 26, 2015ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 3, 2015ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Mar 31, 2015EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Mar 30, 2015EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Mar 20, 2015EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Mar 20, 2015EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Oct 23, 2014ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Oct 20, 2014ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 20, 2014REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Aug 26, 2014EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Aug 25, 2014EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Aug 20, 2014EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Aug 20, 2014EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 28, 2014EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Mar 27, 2014EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Mar 24, 2014EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Mar 24, 2014EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Oct 16, 2013EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Oct 15, 2013EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Oct 11, 2013AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Sep 9, 2013EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Sep 9, 2013EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 6, 2013EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Mar 4, 2013EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Mar 4, 2013EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Mar 4, 2013EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 25, 2012NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jul 31, 2012NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jul 31, 2012PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 11, 2012NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Jun 22, 2012PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jun 21, 2012CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 15, 2012RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Dec 7, 2011RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Dec 7, 2011ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jun 7, 2011GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jun 7, 2011GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jun 7, 2011CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Jun 6, 2011TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 6, 2011CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 6, 2011TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 7, 2010GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 7, 2010GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 7, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 2, 2010DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 21, 2010MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED—
Sep 18, 2010NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Sep 17, 2010NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance