Drawing for CRETORS CRUNCH! CC

USPTO serial 85129496

CRETORS CRUNCH! CC

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
STOIDES, KATHERINE
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CRETORS CRUNCH! CC?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

James L. Vana

JAMES L. VANA PERKINS COIE LLPSTE 49001201 3RD AVESEATTLE, WA 98101-3099

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
030Food starch that causes expansion of a variety of food products under heatACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 24, 2015MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 24, 2015ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 30, 2015EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jan 29, 2015EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Jan 23, 2015EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Jan 23, 2015EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 29, 2014EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jul 28, 2014EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Jul 23, 2014EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Jul 23, 2014EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 23, 2014TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
May 9, 2014CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
May 9, 2014COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Jan 31, 2014EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jan 30, 2014EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Jan 23, 2014EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Jan 23, 2014EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 24, 2013EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Aug 23, 2013EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Aug 23, 2013AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Jul 24, 2013EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Jul 24, 2013EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 18, 2013EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jan 16, 2013EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jan 16, 2013EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jan 16, 2013EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 16, 2013TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jul 24, 2012NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
May 29, 2012NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
May 29, 2012PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 9, 2012NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Apr 20, 2012PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Apr 18, 2012CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 6, 2012TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 5, 2012CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 5, 2012ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED—
Jan 19, 2012RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jan 9, 2012ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 7, 2011GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jul 7, 2011GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jul 7, 2011CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Jun 16, 2011TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 15, 2011CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 15, 2011TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 21, 2010GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 21, 2010GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 21, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 21, 2010DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 21, 2010MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED—
Sep 20, 2010NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Sep 17, 2010NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance