Drawing for DIAMOND

USPTO serial 85130181

DIAMOND

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
POWERS, ALEXANDER L
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with DIAMOND?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Daniel I. Schloss

Daniel I. Schloss GREENBERG TRAURIG, LLP200 PARK AVENUE, 38TH FLOORNEW YORK, NY 10166UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
021Paper baking cupsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 3, 2017MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 3, 2017ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 1, 2016EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Aug 31, 2016EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Aug 22, 2016EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Aug 22, 2016EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 22, 2016TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Mar 11, 2016EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Mar 10, 2016EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Feb 18, 2016EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Feb 18, 2016EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 18, 2016TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Feb 17, 2016CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Feb 17, 2016EWAFTEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED-FIRM RETAINS—
Sep 3, 2015EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Sep 2, 2015EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Aug 24, 2015EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Aug 24, 2015EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 19, 2015EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
May 18, 2015EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
May 18, 2015AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Apr 6, 2015NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED—
Apr 6, 2015TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
Apr 6, 2015PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Apr 6, 2015PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Mar 30, 2015MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 30, 2015ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 26, 2015EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Aug 26, 2014NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jul 11, 2014TMBNTTAB RELEASE CASE TO TRADEMARKS—
Jul 11, 2014OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Jul 11, 2014OP.DOPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999—
Feb 29, 2012ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Jul 7, 2011OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
May 24, 2011ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Apr 26, 2011NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Apr 26, 2011PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 23, 2011PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Mar 17, 2011CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 17, 2011XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Mar 16, 2011ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 16, 2011GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Mar 16, 2011GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Mar 16, 2011CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Mar 15, 2011TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 15, 2011CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 15, 2011TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 22, 2010GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 22, 2010GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 22, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 22, 2010DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 20, 2010NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Sep 18, 2010NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance