USPTO serial 85130393
Serial No. 85130393
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BIDDULPH, HEATHER ANN
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with Serial No. 85130393?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Kyoto-city, Kyoto, JP
Kyoto-city, Kyoto, JP
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Mark D. Alleman
MARK D. ALLEMAN ALLEMAN HALL MCCOY RUSSELL & TUTTLE LLP806 SW BROADWAY STE 600PORTLAND, OR 97205-3335UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Light emitting diodes; plant incubators for laboratory use; power supply units for illuminators; cinematographic instruments and apparatuses; microscopes; electronic inspection devices for inspection of industrial products utilizing light reflection and light transmission; electronic machines, apparatuses and their parts, namely, semiconductor devices; spectacles; magnifying glasses; magnifying glasses with LED illumination devices | ACTIVE | — |
| 010 | Lighting apparatuses specially designed for surgical operations; lighting apparatuses for medical treatments by warming diseased parts of the body with irradiation of LED light; intra-oral dental light system; dental operating lamps; lighting apparatuses for physical and mental healing utilizing blinking lights, changes of LED light intensities, or changes in colors of light; medical machines and apparatuses for medical treatments by irradiating LED light onto diseased areas of the body; ophthalmoscopes; ophthalmometers; instruments for measuring the diameter of ophthalmic lenses; surgical apparatuses for use in ophthalmic surgery; medical machines and apparatuses to identify diseased areas of the body by irradiating LED light to the body and receiving response from the diseased areas; medical apparatus for examination of the eyes used by ophthalmologists | ACTIVE | — |
| 011 | Lighting apparatuses for vehicle interiors and theaters; lighting apparatuses for industrial inspection of products, growing plants, farming, retail stores, household use, offices, restaurants, art museums, and photo studios, namely, LED (light emitting diodes); lighting fixtures for use in display, commercial, industrial, residential, and architectural accent lighting applications; LED lighting fixtures; lighting apparatuses for illumination of clothing, accessories, interior and exterior of structures and trees, namely, LED light fixtures for clothing and clothing accessories, LED lighting fixtures for interior and exterior of structure, and tree lighting applications; LED light bulbs; LED light tubes; floor-standing lights; table lights; LED light fixtures for laboratory experimental and research purposes; LED light fixtures for observation of specimens used with microscopes; electrical lamps; over-head lamps | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 31, 2012 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 31, 2012 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 29, 2012 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 3, 2012 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 14, 2012 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 27, 2012 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 27, 2012 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 9, 2012 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Feb 9, 2012 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 9, 2012 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 9, 2012 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 21, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 20, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 20, 2012 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 21, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 21, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 22, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 22, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 22, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 23, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 22, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 22, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 22, 2010 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Sep 21, 2010 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Sep 18, 2010 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |