USPTO serial 85130714
HOKKAIDO RESTAURANT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CASE, LEIGH CAROLINE
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with HOKKAIDO RESTAURANT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Los Angeles, CA
Los Angeles, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Kenneth I. Gross, Esq.
849 S BROADWAY APT 504LOS ANGELES, CA 90014-3232UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 043 | Restaurant services; providing of food and drink, catering | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 17, 2013 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 17, 2013 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 20, 2013 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 19, 2013 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 18, 2013 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 17, 2013 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Feb 17, 2013 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Feb 17, 2013 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 17, 2012 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 17, 2012 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 15, 2012 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Aug 22, 2012 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 21, 2012 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 21, 2012 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 6, 2012 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 6, 2012 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Aug 6, 2012 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Aug 6, 2012 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 18, 2012 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 18, 2012 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 15, 2012 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Dec 8, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 15, 2011 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 20, 2011 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 20, 2011 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 17, 2011 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 17, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 5, 2011 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 30, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 30, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 30, 2011 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 11, 2011 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jul 11, 2011 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 11, 2011 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 11, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 10, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 10, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 27, 2010 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 27, 2010 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 27, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 26, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 21, 2010 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Sep 20, 2010 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |