Drawing for KERACELL

USPTO serial 85131111

KERACELL

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
GOLD, BARBARA
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 106 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with KERACELL?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Law Offices of Daphne Sheridan Bass

Daphne Sheridan Bass LAW OFFICES OF DAPHNE SHERIDAN BASS921 26th StreetSanta Monica, CA 90403UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003Adhesives for affixing false eyelashes; Artificial eyelashes; Hair Conditioners; Hair shampoos and conditioners; Non-medicated preparations all for the care of skin, hair and scalp; Skin conditionersACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 12, 2012MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jun 11, 2012ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Nov 3, 2011TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Oct 31, 2011GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 31, 2011GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 31, 2011CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 24, 2011DMCCDATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED—
Sep 24, 2011TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 24, 2011CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 24, 2011TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 1, 2011GEANNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED—
Sep 1, 2011GEAPEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED—
Sep 1, 2011CPEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT AND/OR PRIORITY ACTION - COMPLETED—
Jul 21, 2011TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 21, 2011CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 11, 2011ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jun 24, 2011TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 24, 2010GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 24, 2010GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 24, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 24, 2010DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 2, 2010TAEATEAS AMENDMENT ENTERED BEFORE ATTORNEY ASSIGNED—
Nov 2, 2010PARITEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED—
Sep 22, 2010MDSMNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED—
Sep 21, 2010NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Sep 20, 2010NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance