USPTO serial 85131901
COMCO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KLINE, MATTHEW
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 103 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with COMCO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 011 | Faucets | ACTIVE | Sep 1, 1997 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 12, 2024 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 12, 2024 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| May 12, 2024 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| May 10, 2011 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 10, 2011 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 12, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 12, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 12, 2010 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 12, 2010 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 12, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 12, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 11, 2010 | RSHG | REQUEST FOR SPECIAL HANDLING - GRANTED | — |
| Oct 9, 2010 | RSHG | REQUEST FOR SPECIAL HANDLING - GRANTED | — |
| Sep 30, 2010 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Sep 29, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 23, 2010 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Sep 22, 2010 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Sep 21, 2010 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Sep 21, 2010 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Sep 20, 2010 | RFSH | REQUEST FOR SPECIAL HANDLING RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 20, 2010 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 17, 2010 | RFSH | REQUEST FOR SPECIAL HANDLING RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 17, 2010 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |