USPTO serial 85133099
FIELDPOD
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SAPPENFIELD, ANN
- Law office
- LAW OFFICE 117 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with FIELDPOD?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer hardware and peripheral devices and computer software for data communication and translating and transmitting data sold therewith; Control cabinets specially adapted for traffic control equipment; Control cabinets specially adapted for vehicle traffic control equipment; Electronic communications systems comprised of computer hardware and software for the transmission of data between two points; Software for monitoring and controlling communication between computers and automated machine systems; Speed indicators; Traffic control equipment, namely, actuated and pretimed traffic signal controllers; Traffic lights; Traffic management equipment, namely, display monitors, computers, auto compasses, and software to manage traffic; Traffic-light apparatus; Vehicle detection equipment, namely, display monitors, computers, image sensors, video cameras, and operating system and application software to detect vehicle location; Vehicle traffic signals; Wireless communication devices for voice, data or image transmission; none of the aforesaid goods being apparatus for recording, transmission or reproduction of sound and images, consumer electronic devices, digital music and/or video players, MP3 players and/or mobile phones | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 18, 2012 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 17, 2012 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 21, 2012 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 21, 2012 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 21, 2012 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| May 21, 2012 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Nov 21, 2011 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 21, 2011 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 21, 2011 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 18, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 18, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 14, 2011 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 27, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 15, 2011 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 15, 2011 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 15, 2011 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 13, 2011 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Oct 13, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 13, 2011 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 13, 2011 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 13, 2011 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 11, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 10, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 10, 2011 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 7, 2011 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 7, 2011 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 7, 2011 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 28, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 24, 2010 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Sep 23, 2010 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Sep 23, 2010 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |