Drawing for BIOGLOBAL

USPTO serial 85133475

BIOGLOBAL

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CLYBURN, CARLA DIONNE
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BIOGLOBAL?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Norman P. Soloway

Stephen B. Mosier Hayes Soloway, P.C.4640 E. Skyline DriveTucson, AZ 85718UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
001Agricultural chemicals, namely, insect behavior modifying agents, namely, synthetic semiochemicals, pheromones, kairomones, allomones, and active chemical ingredients and solvents for use in the manufacture of insecticides, plant growth regulators for agriculture use; soil conditioners for agriculture useACTIVE—
005Preparations for pest control purposes, namely, pesticides, insecticides, termiticides and parasiticides, insect repellants and insect attractants in the nature of freeze-dried food bait to attract insects for pest control purposes; insect repellent in the nature of a lamp oil, volatile anti-fungal agents; fumigants; herbicides; fungicides; insecticide in strip form using solvent and vapor technology for home and commercial use; insect catching strips with glue-coated surfaceACTIVE—
021Insect traps; non-electric dispensers for controlled-release of semiochemical control agentsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 14, 2012MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 14, 2012ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 11, 2011NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Aug 16, 2011PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 8, 2011TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jul 27, 2011NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jul 8, 2011PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jun 30, 2011CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 9, 2011ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jun 9, 2011CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 26, 2011MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 5, 2011CPRAPRIORITY ACTION MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Apr 5, 2011CPRAPRIORITY ACTION WRITTENA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Mar 11, 2011ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Mar 11, 2011CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 8, 2011ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Feb 24, 2011MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 28, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 28, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 28, 2010DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 23, 2010CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Nov 23, 2010COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Sep 24, 2010MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED—
Sep 23, 2010NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Sep 23, 2010NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance