Drawing for PURDIGITAL

USPTO serial 85134579

PURDIGITAL

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
HOLTZ, ALLISON
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PURDIGITAL?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Andrea M. Bond

ANDREA M. BOND BRIGGS AND MORGAN, P.A.80 S 8TH ST STE 2200MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402-2157UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer hard drives for storage of digital veterinary radiographic images; blank magnetic and optical and magneto-optical data and digital and optical data carriers for storing digital veterinary radiographic images; magnetic and optical image storage devices for storing digital veterinary radiographic images; digital image panels, namely, flat panel display screens for veterinary radiographic imagesACTIVE—
010Veterinary image generators, namely, x-ray generators; veterinary radiographic image processors; digital radiography systems for veterinary uses, namely, x-ray panel sensors, x-ray panel cases and x-ray grids, tunnels and bumpers; apparatus for veterinary diagnostic radiography consisting of digital veterinary radiographic image storage devices, namely, computer workstations comprising a hard drive, apparatus for recording, transmission or reproduction of images, central processing unit for processing information, data, or images, and preloaded computer software for digital image processing and managementACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 9, 2014MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 9, 2014ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 9, 2013EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Nov 7, 2013EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Nov 7, 2013EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Nov 7, 2013EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 10, 2013EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
May 9, 2013EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
May 8, 2013EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
May 8, 2013EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 27, 2013ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Nov 8, 2012EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Nov 7, 2012EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Nov 7, 2012AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Nov 6, 2012EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Nov 6, 2012EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 17, 2012EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Mar 15, 2012EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Mar 15, 2012EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Mar 15, 2012EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 8, 2011NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Sep 13, 2011NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Sep 13, 2011PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 10, 2011PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Aug 6, 2011CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 14, 2011TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 14, 2011CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 27, 2011TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 27, 2010GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 27, 2010GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 27, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 22, 2010DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 29, 2010TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 29, 2010CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 29, 2010ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Oct 14, 2010PARITEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED—
Sep 25, 2010MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED—
Sep 24, 2010NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Sep 24, 2010NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance