Drawing for NOBACCO JUICE

USPTO serial 85135073

NOBACCO JUICE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
LOTT, MAUREEN DALL
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with NOBACCO JUICE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Kathleen A. Rheintgen

Kathleen A. Rheintgen Husch Blackwell LLP120 S. Riverside Plaza, 22nd FloorChicago, IL 60606UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
005Caffeine preparations for stimulative use in the form of chewing gum; Chewing gum for medical purposes; Imitation cigarettes for quitting smoking; Medicated chewing gum; Medicated chewing gum for cigarette substitutes; Medicated gum for cigarette substitutes; Tobacco and smoking cessation preparations that temporarily reduce the desire to smoke; Tobacco-free cigarettes for medical purposesACTIVE—
034Cigarettes containing tobacco substitutes not for medical purposes; Electronic cigarette lighters; Electronic cigarettes; Smokers' articles, namely, cigar relighting liquid solution; Tobacco substitute; Tobacco substitutes; Tobacco substitutes not for medical purposesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 30, 2013CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Jul 30, 2013COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Dec 19, 2011MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 19, 2011ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 17, 2011NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Mar 24, 2011ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 24, 2011REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Mar 23, 2011WOAGWITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY GRANTED—
Mar 23, 2011WOARTEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED—
Mar 22, 2011NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Mar 22, 2011PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 11, 2011PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Feb 10, 2011CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 10, 2011XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Feb 10, 2011GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Feb 10, 2011GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Feb 10, 2011CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Feb 9, 2011TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Feb 9, 2011CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 7, 2011ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jan 31, 2011TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 27, 2010GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 27, 2010GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 27, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 23, 2010DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 25, 2010MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED—
Sep 24, 2010NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Sep 24, 2010NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance