Drawing for CRIMSON

USPTO serial 85135623

CRIMSON

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CHOSID, ROBIN S
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CRIMSON?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Christopher J. Schulte

CHRISTOPHER J. SCHULTE MERCHANT & GOULD P.C.PO BOX 2910MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402-0910UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Downloadable webinars in the field of medical staff and medical practice managementACTIVE—
035Business consulting and information services in the field of physician performance managementACTIVE—
041Educational services, namely, providing seminars and non-downloadable webinars in the field of medical staff and medical practice managementACTIVE—
042Providing temporary use of online nondownloadable computer software in the field of business intelligence relating to physician and medical practice performance management; Providing technical support services, namely, troubleshooting of computer software problems relating to the use of online nondownloadable computer software in the fields of physician and medical practice performance management and business intelligence relating to physician and medical practice performance managementACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 7, 2013MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 7, 2013ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 5, 2013EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED—
Mar 1, 2013EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Mar 1, 2013EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Mar 1, 2013EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 4, 2012NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jul 10, 2012PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 20, 2012NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jun 5, 2012PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
May 29, 2012CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 15, 2012TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 14, 2012CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 14, 2012ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED—
Feb 1, 2012RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Feb 1, 2012ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Aug 1, 2011CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Jul 30, 2011CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Jul 6, 2011TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 6, 2011CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 6, 2011TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 7, 2011CPRAPRIORITY ACTION MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Jan 6, 2011CPRAPRIORITY ACTION WRITTENA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Dec 29, 2010DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 28, 2010MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED—
Sep 25, 2010NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Sep 25, 2010NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance