Drawing for READ. PLAY. WIN!

USPTO serial 85135784

READ. PLAY. WIN!

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
HINES, REGINA C
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with READ. PLAY. WIN!?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Shane T. Lunceford

Christopher J. Palermo HICKMAN PALERMO TRUONG BECKER BINGHAM WONG LLP1 ALMADEN BOULEVARD - FLOOR 12SAN JOSE, CA 95113UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Online downloadable publications, namely, electronic documents featuring educational materials for parents, guardians, teachers and students at the pre-K to 12th levelACTIVE—
041Educational services, namely, conducting programs for encouraging the development of reading skills at the pre-K to 12th grade level based upon achievements in reading books; tutoring and mentoring students at the pre-K to 12th grade level in reading, literacy, reading comprehension, math and science; providing online non-downloadable publications, namely, web pages featuring educational material for parents, guardians, teachers and students at the pre-K to 12th levelACTIVE—
042Providing temporary use of on-line non-downloadable software tools for use in promoting reading, literacy, reading comprehension, math and scienceACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 3, 2014MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 3, 2014ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 10, 2013EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jul 9, 2013EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Jul 2, 2013EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Jul 2, 2013EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 23, 2013EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jan 22, 2013EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Jan 18, 2013AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Jan 2, 2013EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Jan 2, 2013EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 20, 2012TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jun 16, 2012EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jun 14, 2012EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jun 14, 2012EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jun 14, 2012EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 3, 2012NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Nov 8, 2011NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Nov 8, 2011PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 3, 2011PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Sep 29, 2011CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 29, 2011XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Sep 29, 2011GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Sep 29, 2011GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Sep 29, 2011CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Aug 22, 2011ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Aug 15, 2011PBCRWITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY—
Aug 3, 2011PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jul 28, 2011ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 11, 2011CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 1, 2011TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 30, 2011CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 30, 2011TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 30, 2010GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 30, 2010GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 30, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 18, 2010DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 30, 2010TAEATEAS AMENDMENT ENTERED BEFORE ATTORNEY ASSIGNED—
Sep 30, 2010PARITEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED—
Sep 26, 2010NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Sep 25, 2010NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance