USPTO serial 85135970
SC
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ALI, STEPHANIE MARIE
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SC?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jill M. Pietrini
Jill M. Pietrini SHEPPARD MULLIN RICHTER & HAMPTON LLP1901 AVENUE OF THE STARS, SUITE 1600LOS ANGELES, CA 90067-6017UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 021 | Toothbrush holders; toothbrushes; tumblers; meal trays; lotion dispensers and pumps sold empty; soap dishes; fitted vanity cases; wastebaskets; towel bars; shower caddies; perfume sprayers sold empty; mugs; mug trees; fabric mitts for cleaning glass and porcelain; napkin holders; nail brushes; hair combs; hair brushes; bottle openers; holiday ornaments of ceramic; mops; brooms; dinnerware; china dinnerware; dishes; cups; drinking glasses; glass bowls; glass pans; paper cups and plates; pitchers; plates; salt and pepper shakers; serving spoons; spice racks; lunch boxes; jugs; candle holders not of precious metal; and candle sticks not of precious metal; plates and cups made of plastic; cleaning dusters; decorative memory keepsake boxes made of glass or ceramic | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by SC LICENSING, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by SHABBY CHIC BRANDS, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by SHABBY CHIC BRANDS, LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 021
- Similar marks named SC
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 23, 2021 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 23, 2021 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 29, 2021 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 28, 2021 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 15, 2021 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jan 15, 2021 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 16, 2020 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 14, 2020 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 14, 2020 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jul 14, 2020 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 14, 2020 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 10, 2020 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 10, 2020 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jan 10, 2020 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 11, 2019 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Jul 9, 2019 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 9, 2019 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jul 9, 2019 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 20, 2019 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Feb 19, 2019 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 15, 2019 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - MAILED | — |
| Feb 14, 2019 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Feb 14, 2019 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Feb 14, 2019 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 11, 2019 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 9, 2019 | NOAC | CORRECTED NOA MAILED | — |
| Feb 8, 2019 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 8, 2019 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 6, 2019 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 17, 2019 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jan 17, 2019 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 17, 2019 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 17, 2018 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 22, 2018 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 2, 2018 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 14, 2018 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Apr 13, 2018 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 12, 2018 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Apr 12, 2018 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 12, 2018 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 23, 2018 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Mar 31, 2017 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Jun 29, 2016 | RBFT | REPLY BRIEF FILED - CHECK TTAB FILES | — |
| Jun 2, 2016 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Jun 1, 2016 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 2, 2016 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Dec 7, 2015 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| Dec 7, 2015 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 12, 2015 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Aug 25, 2015 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Aug 20, 2015 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Aug 20, 2015 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 18, 2015 | CFRC | SUBSEQUENT FINAL MAILED | — |
| Feb 18, 2015 | CFRC | SUBSEQUENT FINAL MAILED | — |
| Feb 13, 2015 | CFRC | SUBSEQUENT FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 29, 2014 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 29, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 24, 2014 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 18, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 18, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 12, 2014 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| May 12, 2014 | OTHE | CASE RETURNED TO EXAMINATION | — |
| Apr 15, 2014 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Apr 11, 2014 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 19, 2014 | IUCN | NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED | — |
| Mar 18, 2014 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 21, 2013 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Sep 19, 2013 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 19, 2013 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 19, 2013 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 10, 2013 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Mar 19, 2013 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 13, 2013 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 22, 2013 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 22, 2013 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 2, 2013 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 25, 2012 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Nov 9, 2012 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 8, 2012 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 2, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 2, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 11, 2012 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 6, 2012 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 6, 2012 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 6, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 2, 2012 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Mar 12, 2012 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Feb 29, 2012 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 28, 2012 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Feb 27, 2012 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 30, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 30, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 30, 2012 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 18, 2012 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jan 18, 2012 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jan 18, 2012 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jan 17, 2012 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 25, 2011 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jul 25, 2011 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 25, 2011 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 14, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 14, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 14, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 16, 2011 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 16, 2011 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 16, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 29, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 28, 2010 | MDSM | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Sep 27, 2010 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Sep 25, 2010 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |