USPTO serial 85136211
ADAPTIVE TEMPLATE TECHNOLOGY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- STEIN, JAMES W
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 107 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ADAPTIVE TEMPLATE TECHNOLOGY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Zachary D. Messa
ZACHARY D MESSA JOHNSON POPE BOKOR RUPPEL ET AL403 E MADISON ST STE 400TAMPA, FL 33602-4614UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Electronic medical records software for database management, namely, the creation, management, and access to medical records and charts | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 17, 2013 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| May 17, 2013 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| May 17, 2013 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Feb 28, 2013 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Aug 1, 2012 | GNSN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 1, 2012 | GNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 1, 2012 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 4, 2012 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Mar 16, 2012 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Mar 16, 2012 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 7, 2012 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 7, 2012 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 7, 2012 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 1, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 1, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 17, 2012 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 9, 2012 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 9, 2012 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Feb 9, 2012 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Feb 9, 2012 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Aug 9, 2011 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Aug 9, 2011 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 9, 2011 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 13, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 12, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 12, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 12, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 12, 2011 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 12, 2011 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 12, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 31, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 27, 2010 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Sep 27, 2010 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |