USPTO serial 85136411
SUPER SIPPER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- RICHARDS, LESLIE
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SUPER SIPPER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jason M. Sneed
Jason M. Sneed Alston & Bird LLP101 South Tryon Street Ste 4000Charlotte, NC 28280-4000UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 010 | cups for babies, infants and children; feeding bottles; feeding bottle teats; teats for babies, infants and children; re-usable and disposable teats for bottles and drinking cups for babies, infants and children | ACTIVE | — |
| 021 | Cups for babies and children; valves for drinking cups sold as a unit with drinking cups for babies and children; plastic or silicone valves for drinking cups (re-usable or disposable) sold as a unit with drinking cups for babies and children | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Jackel International Limited
- Other trademarks owned by Jackel International Limited
- Other trademarks in Class 010
- Other trademarks in Class 021
- Similar marks named SUPER SIPPER
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 5, 2015 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 5, 2015 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 6, 2015 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Mar 5, 2015 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 27, 2015 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Feb 27, 2015 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 22, 2014 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 8, 2014 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Jul 5, 2014 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 1, 2014 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jul 1, 2014 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 28, 2014 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Feb 27, 2014 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 18, 2014 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Feb 18, 2014 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 6, 2013 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Aug 5, 2013 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 3, 2013 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 10, 2013 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jul 10, 2013 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 5, 2013 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Mar 1, 2013 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 1, 2013 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Mar 1, 2013 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 4, 2012 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 10, 2012 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 20, 2012 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 6, 2012 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 30, 2012 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 9, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 9, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 26, 2012 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 27, 2011 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 23, 2011 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 21, 2011 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 21, 2011 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 3, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 3, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 31, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 27, 2011 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Apr 18, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 14, 2011 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 1, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 30, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 24, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 28, 2010 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Sep 27, 2010 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |