USPTO serial 85136442
CASE MANAGEMENT BODY OF KNOWLEDGE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 4106960Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Feb 28, 2012
- Examiner
- MAKHDOOM, SAIMA
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with CASE MANAGEMENT BODY OF KNOWLEDGE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Robert S. Beiser
ROBERT S BEISER VEDDER PRICE PC222 NORTH LASALLE STREETSUITE 2600CHICAGO, IL 60601-1003Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | providing an interactive website that enables users to enter, access, track, monitor and generate health and medical information and reports | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jun 1, 2011 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Commission for Case Manager Certification
- Other trademarks owned by Commission for Case Manager Certification
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named CASE MANAGEMENT BODY OF KNOWLEDGE
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 5, 2018 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Feb 28, 2017 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 31, 2013 | TMBN | TTAB RELEASE CASE TO TRADEMARKS | — |
| Dec 31, 2013 | CANT | CANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 31, 2013 | CAND | CANCELLATION DENIED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 27, 2012 | PETC | CANCELLATION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 28, 2012 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Jan 23, 2012 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 12, 2012 | AAUA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF AMENDMENT TO ALLEGE USE E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 11, 2012 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 11, 2012 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Jan 7, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 7, 2012 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 7, 2012 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jan 6, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 6, 2012 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 6, 2012 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 22, 2011 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Aug 22, 2011 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 22, 2011 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 1, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 1, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 15, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 30, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 31, 2010 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 31, 2010 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 31, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 30, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 27, 2010 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Sep 27, 2010 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |