Drawing for MAGIC SK8 BALL

USPTO serial 85139092

MAGIC SK8 BALL

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SHIH, SALLY
Law office
TTAB

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 604: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with MAGIC SK8 BALL?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

David J. Powsner

DAVID J POWSNER NUTTER MCCLENNEN & FISH LLP155 SEAPORT BLVDBOSTON, MA 02210-2698UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer software for mobile phones, personal digital assistants and electronic hand-held devices, namely, electronic game software; hand-held units for playing electronic games for use with external display screen or monitor; Electronics for skateboards, namely, (i) audio devices in the nature of loudspeakers and in the nature of portable and handheld digital electronics for audio playback indicative of skateboard use, characteristics and environment (ii) Electronic sensors for measuring physical characteristics of skateboards and their environment (iii) communication devices in the nature of digital transmitters and receivers for communicating measurements of physical characteristics of skateboards and their environmentABANDONED—
028Skateboards; hand held units for playing electronic games other than those adapted for use with an external display screen or monitorABANDONED—
041Providing an Internet website portals in the field of recreation, namely, electronic games and skateboardingABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 5, 2012MAB4ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION—
Sep 5, 2012ABN4ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION—
Sep 5, 2012OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Sep 5, 2012OP.SOPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999—
May 25, 2012OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Feb 23, 2012EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Feb 15, 2012ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Feb 7, 2012NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Feb 7, 2012PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 18, 2012NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Jan 5, 2012PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jan 3, 2012ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Dec 13, 2011CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 13, 2011XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Dec 13, 2011GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Dec 13, 2011GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Dec 13, 2011CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Dec 7, 2011TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Dec 7, 2011ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Dec 7, 2011EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Dec 7, 2011JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Dec 7, 2011EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Jun 9, 2011GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Jun 9, 2011GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 9, 2011CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 25, 2011TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 25, 2011CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 25, 2011TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 29, 2010GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 29, 2010GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 29, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 29, 2010DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 1, 2010MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED—
Sep 30, 2010NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Sep 30, 2010NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance