Drawing for ARCHIHUB

USPTO serial 85139446

ARCHIHUB

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
IN, SUNG HYUN
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 103 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with ARCHIHUB?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
038Providing an on-line forum for architects and designers to network and share informationACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 3, 2012MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Nov 30, 2012ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
May 4, 2012GNS2NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
May 4, 2012GNSIINQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
May 4, 2012CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
May 1, 2012NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED—
May 1, 2012TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 30, 2012CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 30, 2012TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 30, 2012PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Apr 30, 2012PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Mar 1, 2012MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Feb 29, 2012ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Aug 2, 2011GNS2NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Aug 2, 2011GNSIINQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Aug 2, 2011CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
Jul 8, 2011RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Jul 8, 2011ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jan 8, 2011GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jan 8, 2011GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jan 8, 2011CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Jan 6, 2011DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 2, 2010MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED—
Oct 1, 2010NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Oct 1, 2010NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance