Drawing for CHINA CENTER

USPTO serial 85141046

CHINA CENTER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
FOSDICK, GEOFFREY A
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CHINA CENTER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Christopher Gaspar

Christopher Gaspar Milbank, Tweed Hadley & McCloy LLP1 Chase Manhattan PlazaNew York, NY 10005UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
036Leasing of office space; Leasing of real estate; Rental of office spaceACTIVE—
043Catering for the provision of food and beverages; Catering services; Provision of conference, exhibition and meeting facilities; Provision of exhibition facilities; Provision of facilities for conventions; Provision of facilities for exhibitions; Provision of fair and exhibition facilities; Provision of food and drink in restaurants; Restaurant and bar services; Restaurant and catering services; Restaurant, bar and catering servicesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 22, 2014MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 22, 2014ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 21, 2014EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
May 20, 2014EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
May 13, 2014EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
May 13, 2014EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Dec 10, 2013EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Dec 9, 2013EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Nov 12, 2013EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Nov 12, 2013EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 18, 2013EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jun 17, 2013EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Jun 8, 2013AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
May 15, 2013EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
May 15, 2013EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 16, 2012EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Nov 15, 2012EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Nov 12, 2012EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Nov 12, 2012EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 8, 2012EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jun 8, 2012NOACCORRECTED NOA E-MAILED—
Jun 7, 2012DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Jun 7, 2012EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jun 6, 2012AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
May 15, 2012DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
May 15, 2012EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
May 15, 2012ERTDTEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED—
May 15, 2012EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 15, 2011NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Sep 20, 2011NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Sep 20, 2011PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 18, 2011PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Aug 17, 2011RTTPRESTORE TO TEAS PLUS—
Aug 8, 2011CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 6, 2011TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 6, 2011CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 20, 2011ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 6, 2011TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 1, 2011ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 1, 2011REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jan 10, 2011GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 10, 2011GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 10, 2011CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 10, 2011RFTPREMOVED FROM TEAS PLUS—
Jan 7, 2011DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 5, 2010MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED—
Oct 4, 2010NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Oct 2, 2010NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance