Drawing for PERFORMANCE WITHIN REACH

USPTO serial 85141188

PERFORMANCE WITHIN REACH

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
HWANG, JOHN C B
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PERFORMANCE WITHIN REACH?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Ronald Spuhler

RONALD SPUHLER MCANDREWS HELD & MALLOY LTD500 W MADISON ST34TH FLCHICAGO, IL 60661

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
006Metal audio, video and computer wall and ceiling mountsACTIVE
009Televisions; amplifiers; audio speakers; DVD players; video recorders; digital video recorders (DVRs); CD players; MP3 players; radios; portable radios; portable media players; cameras; digital cameras; video cameras; digital video cameras; radios incorporating clocks; GPS navigation devices; electronic book readers; computers, namely, netbooks; voltage surge protectors; electric cables and cord sets for consumer electronic products; bags and cases especially adapted for holding or carrying consumer electronic products; electric charging cables; electronic docking stations; earphones and headphones; wireless cellular phone headsets; wireless receivers and transmitters for portable media playersACTIVE
020Non-metal audio, video and computer wall and ceiling mounts; cabinets and furniture for consumer electronic productsACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 14, 2014MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 14, 2014ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 13, 2013EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED
Aug 12, 2013EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED
Jul 31, 2013EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED
Jul 31, 2013EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 20, 2013EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED
Mar 19, 2013EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED
Mar 2, 2013EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED
Mar 2, 2013EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 2, 2013TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Aug 21, 2012EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED
Aug 20, 2012EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED
Aug 15, 2012EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED
Aug 15, 2012EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 3, 2012ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 3, 2012REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
Mar 10, 2012EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED
Mar 8, 2012EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED
Mar 8, 2012EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED
Mar 8, 2012EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 30, 2011EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED
Aug 29, 2011EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED
Aug 29, 2011AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL
Aug 26, 2011EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED
Aug 26, 2011EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 8, 2011NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jan 11, 2011NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED
Jan 11, 2011PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 9, 2010PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Dec 9, 2010ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Nov 17, 2010CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Nov 17, 2010DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Oct 4, 2010NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Oct 2, 2010NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance