Drawing for CDW

USPTO serial 85141350

CDW

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
GUSTASON, ANNE C
Law office
DIVISIONAL UNIT

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CDW?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Gregory J. Chinlund

GREGORY J. CHINLUND MARSHALL, GERSTEIN & BORUN LLP233 S WACKER DR STE 6300CHICAGO, IL 60606-6471UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer and telephony hardware and software; preconfigured computer and networking hardware; preconfigured computer software used to enable medical record-keeping and point of care functions to be performed through a computer; computer and telephony hardware and software used to enable medical record-keeping and point of care functions to be performed through a computer; preconfigured computer and networking hardware in a medical setting; preconfigured software used to enable medical record-keeping and point of care functions to be performed through a computer in the medical field; computer and telephony hardware and software used to enable telephone functions to be performed through a computerACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 23, 2022ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Jan 12, 2022ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Jan 12, 2015MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 12, 2015ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 25, 2014EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jun 24, 2014EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Jun 12, 2014EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Jun 12, 2014EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 12, 2014TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Dec 24, 2013EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Dec 23, 2013EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Dec 12, 2013EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Dec 12, 2013EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 9, 2013EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jul 8, 2013EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Jun 12, 2013EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Jun 12, 2013EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 8, 2013ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Apr 30, 2013NOACCORRECTED NOA E-MAILED—
Apr 29, 2013DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Dec 7, 2012EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Dec 6, 2012AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Dec 5, 2012DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Dec 5, 2012EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Dec 5, 2012EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Dec 5, 2012EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Dec 5, 2012ERTDTEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED—
Jun 12, 2012NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Apr 17, 2012NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Apr 17, 2012PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 28, 2012NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Mar 13, 2012PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Mar 12, 2012CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 10, 2012TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 9, 2012CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 9, 2012TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 21, 2012GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 21, 2012GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 21, 2012CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 15, 2012ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Feb 13, 2012PBCRWITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY—
Jan 30, 2012PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jan 26, 2012CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 26, 2012TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 26, 2012CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 19, 2012TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 27, 2011DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 21, 2011GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 21, 2011GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 21, 2011CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 7, 2011ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Jun 24, 2011PBCRWITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY—
Jun 16, 2011PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jun 16, 2011CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 16, 2011XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Jun 16, 2011GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jun 16, 2011GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jun 16, 2011CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Jun 9, 2011ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Jun 7, 2011PBCRWITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY—
May 23, 2011PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
May 20, 2011CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 20, 2011XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
May 20, 2011GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
May 20, 2011GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
May 20, 2011CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
May 20, 2011ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
May 16, 2011PBTQWITHDRAWN FROM PUB OTQR REQUEST—
May 3, 2011PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Apr 27, 2011CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 6, 2011TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 6, 2011CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 6, 2011ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Apr 4, 2011TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 12, 2010GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 12, 2010GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 12, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 11, 2010DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 6, 2010MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED—
Oct 5, 2010NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Oct 2, 2010NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance