Drawing for PRECISION LIGHTING & TRANSFORMER

USPTO serial 85141698

PRECISION LIGHTING & TRANSFORMER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
FINE, STEVEN
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 110 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PRECISION LIGHTING & TRANSFORMER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Matthew H. Swyers

MATTHEW H SWYERS THE TRADEMARK COMPANY344 MAPLE AVE W STE 151VIENNA, VA 22180-5612UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Lighting ballasts; TransformersACTIVE—
011Electric lighting fixtures; Lamps; LightbulbsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 8, 2012MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
May 31, 2012ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
May 31, 2012EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Apr 16, 2012EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Jan 27, 2012GEA1NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Jan 27, 2012GECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Jan 27, 2012CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
Dec 23, 2011EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Dec 23, 2011JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Dec 23, 2011EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Dec 16, 2011TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 16, 2011CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 16, 2011ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Jul 7, 2011GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Jul 7, 2011GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 7, 2011CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 15, 2011TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 15, 2011CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 15, 2011TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 18, 2011GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 18, 2011GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 18, 2011CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 10, 2011DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 6, 2010MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED—
Oct 5, 2010NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Oct 4, 2010NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance