Drawing for COFFEETAMIN

USPTO serial 85142083

COFFEETAMIN

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
VALLILLO, MELISSA C
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with COFFEETAMIN?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Farhad Novian

DARIUSH G. ADLI ADLI LAW GROUP P.C.633 WEST FIFTH STREET, SUITE 6900LOS ANGELES, CA 90071UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
005Coffee-based vitamin fortified beveragesACTIVE—
030Coffee, Beverages made of Coffee BaseACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 2, 2012MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 2, 2012ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 14, 2012EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED—
Feb 11, 2012EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Feb 11, 2012AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Jan 18, 2012ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 18, 2012REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jan 18, 2012TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
Jan 18, 2012PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Jan 18, 2012PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Jan 2, 2012MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 2, 2012ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 30, 2011EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Nov 22, 2011WOAGWITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY GRANTED—
Nov 22, 2011WOARTEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED—
Jul 29, 2011TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
May 31, 2011NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Apr 5, 2011PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 16, 2011NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Mar 1, 2011PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Feb 28, 2011CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED—
Feb 28, 2011CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 28, 2011XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Feb 28, 2011CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Feb 22, 2011ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Feb 18, 2011PBCRWITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY—
Feb 10, 2011PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Feb 7, 2011ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jan 10, 2011CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 10, 2011DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 5, 2010NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Oct 4, 2010NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance