USPTO serial 85142850
GHOSTS OF JUPITER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- VERHOSEK, WILLIAM T
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 114 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with GHOSTS OF JUPITER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Somerville, MA
Somerville, MA
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | tops; shirts, polo shirts, T-shirts, sweatshirts; pullovers; long-sleeved shirts and long sleeved T-shirts; fleece tops; thermal tops; jerseys; tank tops | ACTIVE | Apr 15, 2013 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 13, 2014 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 13, 2014 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 6, 2013 | WOAG | WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY GRANTED | — |
| Sep 6, 2013 | WOAR | TEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 14, 2013 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 14, 2013 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 14, 2013 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Aug 13, 2013 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 13, 2013 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 29, 2013 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - MAILED | — |
| Jul 25, 2013 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jul 25, 2013 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Jul 25, 2013 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jul 25, 2013 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 25, 2013 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Jul 25, 2013 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 9, 2013 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 9, 2013 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 21, 2013 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Mar 8, 2013 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 7, 2013 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 2, 2013 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 1, 2013 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Feb 1, 2013 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Feb 1, 2013 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 22, 2013 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 21, 2013 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 21, 2012 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jul 14, 2012 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 13, 2012 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 9, 2012 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 9, 2012 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Jul 9, 2012 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jul 9, 2012 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 21, 2012 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jan 7, 2012 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 7, 2012 | NOAC | CORRECTED NOA E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 6, 2012 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 6, 2012 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 6, 2012 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 21, 2011 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Dec 21, 2011 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 21, 2011 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 21, 2011 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 21, 2011 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 26, 2011 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 26, 2011 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 22, 2011 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 18, 2011 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 18, 2011 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 18, 2011 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 18, 2011 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 18, 2011 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 15, 2011 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 15, 2011 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 15, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 9, 2011 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Mar 7, 2011 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Feb 18, 2011 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 10, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 12, 2011 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 12, 2011 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 12, 2011 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 12, 2011 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 12, 2011 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 11, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 5, 2010 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |