Drawing for D-MOMETER

USPTO serial 85143204

D-MOMETER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 4187358Status 713
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Aug 7, 2012
Examiner
TANNER, MICHAEL R
Law office
TTAB

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with D-MOMETER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Howard M. Gitten

DOMINICK TAMBORRA2471 LAVAL DRIVEDELTONA, FL 32738UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Food spoilage monitoring system comprising electronic sensors for measuring temperature and time, a warning alarm and computer hardware and software for triggering an alarm and generating reports as a function of the sensed temperature and time for reporting spoiled food events for providing notice of spoiled foodSECTION 18 - CANCELLEDMay 3, 2012

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 16, 2018C18.CANCELLED SECTION 18-TOTAL—
Mar 16, 2018CANTCANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Mar 2, 2018CANGCANCELLATION GRANTED NO. 999999—
Oct 19, 2017PETCCANCELLATION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Aug 7, 2017REM1COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED—
Feb 12, 2016TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Aug 7, 2012R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jul 3, 2012SUNANOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF STATEMENT OF USE MAILED—
Jul 3, 2012EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED—
Jul 2, 2012REGVLAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jul 2, 2012CNPRALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED—
Jul 2, 2012SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Jul 2, 2012EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Jun 29, 2012AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Jun 7, 2012EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Jun 7, 2012EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 16, 2012IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
May 16, 2012EISUTEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVEDThe applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action.
Nov 4, 2011EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED—
Nov 2, 2011EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Nov 2, 2011EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Nov 2, 2011EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 7, 2011NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Apr 12, 2011PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 23, 2011NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Mar 10, 2011PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Mar 10, 2011ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Feb 15, 2011CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 15, 2011CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Feb 14, 2011XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Feb 14, 2011CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Jan 24, 2011TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 24, 2011CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 24, 2011TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 11, 2011CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 11, 2011CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 11, 2011DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 7, 2010MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED—
Oct 6, 2010NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Oct 5, 2010NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance