Drawing for SHRIMP HOUSE SEAFOOD PASTA & GRILL

USPTO serial 85144428

SHRIMP HOUSE SEAFOOD PASTA & GRILL

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
PINO, BRIAN
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SHRIMP HOUSE SEAFOOD PASTA & GRILL?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Arturo Pérez-Guerrero

ARTURO PÉREZ-GUERRERO LAW OFFICES OF ARTURO PÉREZ-GUERREROP.O. BOX 9024163SAN JUAN, PR 00902-4163UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
029Seafood; Seafood, namely, prepared entrees consisting primarily of seafood, prepared entrees consisting primarily of shrimps, prepared entrees consisting primarily of crustaceans, prepared entrees consisting primarily of not live fish, prepared frozen entrees consisting primarily of seafood, prepared frozen entrees consisting primarily of shrimps, prepared frozen entrees consisting primarily of crustaceans, prepared frozen entrees consisting primarily of not live fishACTIVE—
030Bakery desserts; Cakes; Candies; Dessert puddings; Frozen yogurt; PuddingsACTIVE—
035Franchising, namely, offering business management assistance in the establishment and/or operation of restaurantsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 29, 2012MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 28, 2012ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 25, 2011NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Aug 30, 2011NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Aug 30, 2011PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 28, 2011PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jul 28, 2011ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 12, 2011CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 12, 2011XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Jul 12, 2011GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jul 12, 2011GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jul 12, 2011CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Jul 12, 2011ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Jul 5, 2011CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 22, 2011TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 22, 2011CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 22, 2011TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 19, 2011GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 19, 2011GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 19, 2011CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 12, 2011DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 8, 2010MDSMNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED—
Oct 7, 2010NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Oct 7, 2010NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance