Where is the live CopyMark page for USPTO serial 85144501?

The live record is at https://getcopymark.com/trademark/85144501. Use https://getcopymark.com/trademark/{serialNumber} for any 8-digit USPTO serial.

Who owns PRESTIGE CONCRETE PRODUCTS?

According to the public USPTO record for serial number 85144501, the listed owner(s) include: VCNA Prestige Material Holdings, Inc..

What is USPTO serial number 85144501?

Serial number 85144501 is the USPTO application identifier for the mark PRESTIGE CONCRETE PRODUCTS. It is used to track examination, publication, and registration of this trademark.

What is the current status of PRESTIGE CONCRETE PRODUCTS?

PRESTIGE CONCRETE PRODUCTS (85144501) currently shows USPTO status code 603 on the public record. This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Which trademark classes cover PRESTIGE CONCRETE PRODUCTS?

The public record lists International Classes: 019. Each class corresponds to categories of goods or services identified in the application or registration.

4.9/5

USPTO serial 85144501

PRESTIGE CONCRETE PRODUCTS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603

Filing date: Oct 4, 2010
Status date: Apr 3, 2013
Registration date: —
Examiner: ROSSMAN, WILLIAM M
Law office: TMEG LAW OFFICE 109 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PRESTIGE CONCRETE PRODUCTS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner

Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.

Trademark Monitoring

(312) 319-4460

Not the owner?

File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Start a new application

(312) 319-4460

Owner

VCNA Prestige Material Holdings, Inc.
Orlando, FL
Other trademarks owned by VCNA Prestige Material Holdings, Inc.

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Angela Alvarez Sujek

ANGELA ALVAREZ SUJEK BODMAN PLC201 S DIVISION STSUITE 400ANN ARBOR, MI 48104

Goods and services

Class	Description	Status	First use
019	concrete, not including architectural masonry units, namely, glazed concrete blocks used for interior walls	ACTIVE	Jul 1, 2009

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Date	Code	Event	What it means
Apr 4, 2013	MAB3	ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL	—
Apr 3, 2013	ABN3	ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL	—
Apr 3, 2013	EXPT	EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED	—
Jan 18, 2013	EXPA	EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED	—
Aug 27, 2012	RBFT	REPLY BRIEF FILED - CHECK TTAB FILES	—
Aug 9, 2012	GNSN	NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED	—
Aug 9, 2012	GNES	EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED	—
Aug 9, 2012	CNES	EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED	—
Jun 25, 2012	JURT	JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY	—
Apr 18, 2012	GEA1	NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED	—
Apr 18, 2012	GECD	ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED	—
Apr 18, 2012	CNCF	ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED	—
Apr 4, 2012	TEME	TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED	—
Apr 4, 2012	CRFA	CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE	—
Mar 23, 2012	ERFR	TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED	—
Mar 23, 2012	EXPI	EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED	—
Mar 23, 2012	JURT	JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY	—
Mar 23, 2012	EXAF	EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB	—
Sep 23, 2011	GNFN	NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED	—
Sep 23, 2011	GNFR	FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED	A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Sep 23, 2011	CNFR	FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN	A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 29, 2011	TEME	TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED	—
Aug 29, 2011	CRFA	CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE	—
Aug 22, 2011	ALIE	ASSIGNED TO LIE	—
Aug 11, 2011	TROA	TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED	This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 11, 2011	GNRN	NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 11, 2011	GNRT	NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 11, 2011	CNRT	NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 20, 2011	TCCA	TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED	—
Jul 20, 2011	TEME	TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED	—
Jul 20, 2011	CRFA	CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE	—
Jul 20, 2011	TROA	TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED	This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 20, 2011	GNRN	NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 20, 2011	GNRT	NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 20, 2011	CNRT	NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 12, 2011	DOCK	ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER	—
Oct 8, 2010	MDSC	NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED	—
Oct 7, 2010	NWOS	NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED	—
Oct 7, 2010	NWAP	NEW APPLICATION ENTERED	—