USPTO serial 85144520
MINT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FINE, STEVEN
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 110 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with MINT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Santa Clara, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Brian Song
2700 AUGUSTINE DR STE 198SANTA CLARA, CA 95054-2926UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Software development; namely-application software that prints designs or pictures on any objects, on-line game software; design and development of semiconductors; namely-communications chips, networking chips and multi-media chips; High-tech Intellectual property development; namely-IPTV advertisement system, TV applications software, mobile phone applications software; Design and development of hardware; namely-printers, nail printers; Web-based internet service; namely-social networking, blogging service, navigation service, personal finance service; Mobile applications; namely- navigation, game, social networking, payment/transaction system, personal finance all usable by mobile phones; Tablet PC applications software development including iPad applications; Information technology consulting services; Designing and developing special type of fabric | ACTIVE | Jul 27, 2005 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 25, 2013 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 25, 2013 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 18, 2012 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 18, 2012 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| May 21, 2012 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| May 21, 2012 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 21, 2011 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 20, 2011 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 26, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 25, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 25, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 25, 2011 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Oct 25, 2011 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 31, 2011 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 31, 2011 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 20, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 19, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 12, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 8, 2010 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Oct 7, 2010 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Oct 7, 2010 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |