USPTO serial 85145842
ALLIED LAUNDRY LINES
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FALK, ERIN
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 101 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ALLIED LAUNDRY LINES?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Coinamatic Commercial Laundry Inc.
Mississauga, Ontario, CA
Other trademarks owned by Coinamatic Commercial Laundry Inc.
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Michael J. Bevilacqua
MICHAEL J. BEVILACQUA WILMER CUTLER PICKERING HALE & DORR LLP60 STATE ST STE 25BOSTON, MA 02109-1816UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | commercial laundry washers, dryers and related laundry care equipment, namely, laundry ironers, feeders and folders, sheet spreaders, ozone generators, laundry carts and bags, soluble laundry bags, detergent dispensing equipment, laundry conveyors and lifts, laundry shuttles, laundry press, overhead laundry rail conveyers, laundry water reclaim and heat recovery modules, tunnel washers | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 1, 2013 | MAB1 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT | — |
| Feb 1, 2013 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Jan 31, 2013 | EXAR | TEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 22, 2012 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 22, 2012 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 22, 2012 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 7, 2012 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 25, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 25, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 24, 2012 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 30, 2012 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 30, 2012 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 30, 2012 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 9, 2012 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jan 9, 2012 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 6, 2011 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 6, 2011 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 6, 2011 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 15, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 15, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 15, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 20, 2011 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 20, 2011 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 20, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 13, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 9, 2010 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Oct 8, 2010 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |