Drawing for TUSKEGEE HUMAN & CIVIL RIGHTS MULTICULTURAL CENTER

USPTO serial 85145970

TUSKEGEE HUMAN & CIVIL RIGHTS MULTICULTURAL CENTER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 614
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BESCH, JAY C
Law office
PETITIONS OFFICE

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with TUSKEGEE HUMAN & CIVIL RIGHTS MULTICULTURAL CENTER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Vincent M. Amberly

VINCENT M. AMBERLY AMBERLY LAW307 E. MARKET ST. STE #202LEESBURG, VA 20176UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
041Museum services; MuseumsACTIVEOct 1, 2007

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 26, 2013PETDPETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED—
Aug 7, 2013PINMINCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED—
Aug 7, 2013CORVREVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE—
Aug 2, 2013MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 18, 2013PINMINCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED—
Jul 16, 2013APETASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF—
Jul 17, 2012TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 17, 2012CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 16, 2012NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED—
Jul 16, 2012PINMINCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED—
Jul 3, 2012APETASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF—
Jun 11, 2012TPETTEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Apr 9, 2012MAB0ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE—
Apr 9, 2012ABN0ABANDONMENT - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE—
Aug 30, 2011GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Aug 30, 2011GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 30, 2011CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 8, 2011TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 8, 2011CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 1, 2011ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 21, 2011TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 21, 2011RFTPREMOVED FROM TEAS PLUS—
Jan 21, 2011GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 21, 2011GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 21, 2011CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 17, 2011DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 12, 2010MDSMNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED—
Oct 9, 2010NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Oct 9, 2010NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance