Drawing for ON THE MOOOVE

USPTO serial 85146429

ON THE MOOOVE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
HSU, FONG
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 129 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ON THE MOOOVE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jonathan M. Holda, Esq.

JONATHAN M HOLDA OBER KALER GRIMES & SHRIVERA PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION100 LIGHT STREETBALTIMORE, MD 21202

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
029Prepared French fries for immediate consumption, sold at convenience storesACTIVE—
030Breakfast burritos; Burritos; Coffee and tea; Dough-enrobed foods consisting of a dough-based wrapper with fillings consisting primarily of meats, poultry, fish, fruits and vegetables; Hoagies; Pizzas; Sandwiches, all prepared for immediate consumption at convenience stores and excluding dairy productsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 13, 2012MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jul 5, 2012ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jul 5, 2012EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
May 21, 2012EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Apr 3, 2012ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 3, 2012REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Mar 21, 2012ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Mar 1, 2012GEA1NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Mar 1, 2012GECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Mar 1, 2012CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
Jan 30, 2012TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 30, 2012CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 30, 2012ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jan 17, 2012ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Jan 17, 2012EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Jan 17, 2012JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Jan 17, 2012EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Jul 19, 2011GRMLCORRESPONDENCE E-MAILED—
Jul 19, 2011CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 19, 2011TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 19, 2011CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 19, 2011TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 20, 2011GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 20, 2011GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 20, 2011CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 14, 2011DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 13, 2010MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED—
Oct 12, 2010NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Oct 9, 2010NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance