Drawing for IILP INSTITUTE FOR INCLUSION IN THE LEGAL PROFESSION REAL CHANGE. NOW.

USPTO serial 85147181

IILP INSTITUTE FOR INCLUSION IN THE LEGAL PROFESSION REAL CHANGE. NOW.

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CHUO, EMILY M
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 101 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with IILP INSTITUTE FOR INCLUSION IN THE LEGAL PROFESSION REAL CHANGE. NOW.?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Tiffany Walker Shimada

TIFFANY WALKER SHIMADA BRINKS HOFER GILSON & LIONEPO BOX 10395CHICAGO, IL 60610-0395UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Administering and evaluating surveys to law firms and corporations for business purposes in the fields of personal and organizational growth, development and management for facilitating diversity and inclusion in the legal professionACTIVEMar 1, 2010
041Educational services, namely, arranging and conducting educational conferences, programs, seminars, workshops and training sessions for promoting and fostering diversity in the legal profession; conducting continuing legal education programs, seminars and conferences and distributing course materials in connection therewithACTIVEMar 1, 2010

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 21, 2012MAB1ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT—
May 21, 2012ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
May 18, 2012EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED—
Mar 16, 2012GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Mar 16, 2012GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 16, 2012CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 22, 2012TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Feb 21, 2012CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 21, 2012TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 18, 2011GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 18, 2011GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 18, 2011CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 28, 2011TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 27, 2011CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 27, 2011TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 27, 2011GPRNNOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Jan 27, 2011GPRAPRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Jan 27, 2011CPRAPRIORITY ACTION WRITTENA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Jan 18, 2011DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 13, 2010MDSMNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED—
Oct 12, 2010NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Oct 11, 2010NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance