USPTO serial 85147271
REBEL BY ZIGI
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 4813034Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Sep 15, 2015
- Examiner
- POVARCHUK, REBECCA JOYCE
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with REBEL BY ZIGI?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Roberta Jacobs-Meadway
Roberta Jacobs-Meadway Eckert Seamans Cherin & Mellott L.L.C.50 South 16th StreetTwo Liberty Place, 22nd FloorPhiladelphia, PA 19102Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 018 | Bags, namely, handbags, purses, sport bags, athletic bags, beach bags, cosmetic bags sold empty, garment bags for travel, overnight bags, school bags, shoes bags for travel, travel bags | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jun 30, 2011 |
| 025 | Footwear, namely, boots, slippers, thongs, sandals, beach footwear, evening footwear, exercise footwear; Clothing, namely, jackets, vests, belts | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jun 30, 2011 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by ZIGI ENTERPRISES, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by ZIGI ENTERPRISES, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by ZIGI ENTERPRISES, INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 018
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Similar marks named REBEL BY ZIGI
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 25, 2022 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Sep 15, 2020 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 22, 2018 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Mar 22, 2018 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 19, 2018 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 2, 2016 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 15, 2015 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Aug 11, 2015 | SUNA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF STATEMENT OF USE E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 10, 2015 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Aug 4, 2015 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jul 30, 2015 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jul 30, 2015 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Feb 6, 2015 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 5, 2015 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 30, 2015 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jan 30, 2015 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 31, 2014 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 30, 2014 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 29, 2014 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jul 29, 2014 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 31, 2014 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 29, 2014 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 29, 2014 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jan 29, 2014 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 14, 2014 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 30, 2013 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 4, 2013 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 30, 2013 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 30, 2013 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| May 15, 2013 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 1, 2013 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 1, 2013 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 30, 2013 | DMCC | DATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 29, 2013 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 23, 2013 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Apr 15, 2013 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 15, 2013 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 15, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 15, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 15, 2013 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 6, 2012 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 6, 2012 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 5, 2012 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Apr 27, 2012 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 27, 2012 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 20, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 20, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 20, 2012 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 14, 2011 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 10, 2011 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 10, 2011 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| May 10, 2011 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 9, 2011 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 9, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 9, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 22, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 20, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 27, 2010 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Dec 23, 2010 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Dec 15, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 12, 2010 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Oct 11, 2010 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |