USPTO serial 85147353
TYPHOON
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- PENDLETON, CAROLYN A
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with TYPHOON?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Justin B. Bender
JUSTIN B. BENDER JUSTIN B. BENDER, ESQ.445 PARK AVE FL 9NEW YORK, NY 10022-8632UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Pumps and power units for industrial use, namely, air, hydraulic, pneumatic and fluid operated pumps and power units; bolting machines and bolting machine parts for use with bolting machines and tools, namely, sockets, reaction fixtures, adapters, reducers, rings, connectors, extenders, off-set links and silencers; and associated operational, structural and replacement parts thereof, namely, housings, handles, pawls, shifters, motors, gears, spacers, bushings, caps, force transmitters, plugs, covers, screws, springs, pins, buttons, sleeves, drives, plungers, ratchets, drive plates, drive segments, o-ring, rings, seals, piston rods, glands, shrouds, swivels, couplers, retainers, clips, drives, bearings, valves, hoses, controllers, transducers, clutches and washers | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 25, 2013 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 25, 2013 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 19, 2013 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 18, 2013 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 8, 2013 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 8, 2013 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Jul 8, 2013 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jul 8, 2013 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| May 28, 2013 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 27, 2013 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 25, 2013 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jan 8, 2013 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 7, 2013 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 26, 2012 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 26, 2012 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Nov 26, 2012 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Nov 26, 2012 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 26, 2012 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 25, 2012 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jun 29, 2012 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 28, 2012 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 28, 2012 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 12, 2012 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 12, 2012 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Jun 12, 2012 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jun 12, 2012 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| May 29, 2012 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 28, 2012 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 25, 2012 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Oct 25, 2011 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 30, 2011 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 30, 2011 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 24, 2011 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 23, 2011 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 22, 2011 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 22, 2011 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 22, 2011 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 22, 2011 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 22, 2011 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 22, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 22, 2011 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 22, 2011 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 22, 2011 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 18, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 17, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 17, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 17, 2011 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 17, 2011 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 17, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 14, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 12, 2010 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Oct 11, 2010 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |