Drawing for WORKSHARE VIEW POINT

USPTO serial 85148121

WORKSHARE VIEW POINT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
RICHARDS, SUSAN
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with WORKSHARE VIEW POINT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Brian R. Coleman

Brian R. Coleman PERKINS COIE, LLP3150 PORTER DRIVEPALO ALTO, CA 94304UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer software for document and email management; computer software for sharing of documents and emails among users; computer software for document and email version management, and preventing version proliferation of the same document in the document management store; computer software for extending and improving the capabilities provided by third party document management systems; and user manuals supplied as a unit therewithACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 10, 2014MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 10, 2014ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 25, 2013EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jun 22, 2013EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Jun 20, 2013EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Jun 20, 2013EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 23, 2013EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jan 22, 2013EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Jan 22, 2013AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Jan 3, 2013EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Jan 3, 2013EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 7, 2012TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Mar 9, 2012EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Mar 7, 2012EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Mar 7, 2012EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Mar 7, 2012EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 10, 2012NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Nov 29, 2011ETOPEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED—
Jun 16, 2011ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
May 17, 2011NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
May 17, 2011PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 11, 2011PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Apr 10, 2011ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 30, 2011CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 9, 2011XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Mar 8, 2011ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 7, 2011GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Mar 7, 2011GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Mar 7, 2011CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Feb 22, 2011ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Feb 18, 2011PBCRWITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY—
Jan 28, 2011CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 19, 2011DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 14, 2010MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED—
Oct 13, 2010NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Oct 12, 2010NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance