USPTO serial 85148274
BLG U BORDEN LADNER GERVAIS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 4686572Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Feb 17, 2015
- Examiner
- MONINGHOFF, KIM TERESA
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with BLG U BORDEN LADNER GERVAIS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Toronto, Ontario, CA
Toronto, Ontario, CA
Toronto, Ontario, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Dean R. Karau
DEAN R. KARAU FREDRIKSON & BYRON, P.A.200 S 6TH ST STE 4000MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402-1425UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 045 | Legal services; intellectual property agency services, namely, licensing of intellectual property; charitable services, namely, providing pro bono legal services | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Borden Ladner Gervais LLP
- Other trademarks owned by Borden Ladner Gervais LLP
- Other trademarks owned by Borden Ladner Gervais LLP
- Other trademarks in Class 045
- Similar marks named BLG U BORDEN LADNER GERVAIS
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 24, 2021 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Feb 17, 2020 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 17, 2015 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jan 5, 2015 | DP1B | 1(B) BASIS DELETED; PROCEED TO REGISTRATION | — |
| Jan 3, 2015 | DMCC | DATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 18, 2014 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 18, 2014 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 18, 2014 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 18, 2014 | SNEA | SU-EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 12, 2014 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 12, 2014 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 12, 2014 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 7, 2014 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Nov 5, 2014 | IUCN | NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED | — |
| Nov 5, 2014 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 5, 2014 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 5, 2014 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| May 29, 2014 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| May 29, 2014 | NOAC | CORRECTED NOA E-MAILED | — |
| May 28, 2014 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| May 28, 2014 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 28, 2014 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| May 1, 2014 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| May 1, 2014 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| May 1, 2014 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| May 1, 2014 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 5, 2013 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 10, 2013 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 10, 2013 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 21, 2013 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 6, 2013 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 6, 2013 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 2, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 2, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 2, 2013 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 5, 2013 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 5, 2013 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 5, 2013 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 4, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 3, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 3, 2013 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 14, 2013 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 14, 2013 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 14, 2013 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 14, 2013 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jul 12, 2012 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 12, 2012 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 12, 2012 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 11, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 11, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 5, 2012 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 5, 2012 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 5, 2012 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 5, 2012 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 20, 2011 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Dec 20, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 20, 2011 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 20, 2011 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 20, 2011 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 18, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 18, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 18, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 21, 2010 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 21, 2010 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 21, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 15, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 13, 2010 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |