USPTO serial 85149061
AGION LAVA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BUONGIORNO, CHRISTOPHER L
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with AGION LAVA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Edward K Welch II
Edward K Welch II IP&L SOLUTIONS2308 Harrier RunNAPLES, FL 34105UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 024 | (Based on Intent to Use) Odor absorption treatments in the form of applied coatings and topical sprays sold as an integral component of textiles and fabrics, namely, woven and non-woven cloths and fabrics sold in bulk and stock form for use in the manufacture of clothing and household furnishings; odor absorption treatments in the form of applied coatings and topical sprays sold as an integral component of newly manufactured semi-finished goods and articles of manufacture made with cloth, fabrics and textiles, namely, fabric upholstery, fabric mattress pads, curtains, and draperies; odor absorption treatments in the form of applied coatings and topical sprays sold as an integral component of newly manufactured finished goods and articles of manufacture made with cloth, fabrics and textiles, namely, unfitted chair and couch covers, bed linens, bath linens, table linens, flat bed sheets, fitted bed sheets, fabric pillow case liners, fabric mattress pads, bed skirts, curtains, draperies, fabric valances, fabric table runners, fabric place mats, shams, pillow cases, pillow shams, comforters, bed blankets, baby blankets, outdoor blankets, lap blankets, pet blankets, and blanket throws | ACTIVE | — |
| 025 | (Based on Use in Commerce) Odor absorption treatments in the form of applied coatings and topical sprays sold as an integral component of clothing and footwear made of fabrics and textiles, namely, athletic footwear, athletic shoes, casual footwear, casual shoes, bathing suits, swimwear, beach coverups, beachwear, bikinis, blazers, sports coats, jackets, coats, blouses, shirts, sport shirts, dress shirts, tee shirts, sweatshirts, sweat pants, gym shorts, halter tops, body suits, boxer shorts, shorts, baseball caps, caps, hats, overalls, coverups, dresses, skirts, head wear, jeans, pants, slacks, lingerie, pajamas, panties, underwear, undershirt, hunting jackets, hunting shirts, hunting pants, hunting hats, hunting vests, bib overalls for hunting, athletic apparel, namely, shirts, pants, jackets, footwear, hats and caps, and athletic uniforms, socks, sweaters, swimsuits, tank tops, tights, vests, dress suits, rainwear, raincoats, sports over uniforms, gloves, mittens, scarves, thermal underwear and fishing shirts, fishing jackets, fishing vests, fishing pants, and bib overalls for fishing | ACTIVE | Sep 2, 2010 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by AGION TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by SCIESSENT LLC
- Other trademarks owned by SCIESSENT LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 024
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Similar marks named AGION LAVA
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 30, 2013 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 1, 2013 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 1, 2013 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 30, 2012 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 29, 2012 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 28, 2012 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 24, 2012 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Aug 24, 2012 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 24, 2012 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 28, 2012 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 3, 2012 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 3, 2012 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 14, 2011 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 29, 2011 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 29, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 28, 2011 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 28, 2011 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 28, 2011 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 28, 2011 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 28, 2011 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 5, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 5, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 5, 2011 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 3, 2011 | RDX3 | NOTIFICATION FOR REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED | — |
| Oct 3, 2011 | RDX1 | ACTION FOR REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 3, 2011 | RRDX | ACTION REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED COUNTED NOT MAILED | — |
| Sep 2, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 2, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 2, 2011 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 22, 2011 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Aug 22, 2011 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 22, 2011 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 2, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 2, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 30, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 20, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 25, 2011 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jan 21, 2011 | GPRN | NOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Jan 21, 2011 | GPRA | PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Jan 21, 2011 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Jan 19, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 14, 2010 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Oct 13, 2010 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |